PRODUCT

ShareOfSearchOps

Competitive Intelligence Based on Real Behavior.
See where you’re gaining, where you’re losing — and act before competitors do.

4 years of history · City-level precision · Daily updates

A sponsorship that actually moved demand

Brand A invests in a major sponsorship.
Within weeks, its Share of Search increases by +12% — while competitors remain flat.

Not just visibility. Real demand shift.

Why Share of Search works

Search behavior reflects real demand. It shows what people actively look for — not what they say or remember. Across industries, Share of Search has been shown to closely correlate with market share, brand growth and commercial performance.

Visibility doesn’t equal demand. A campaign can generate millions of impressions. But did interest actually increase? Search behavior shows whether it did.

Brand Searches ÷ Total Category Searches = Share of Search

"Over the past 30 years, I've found that the relationship between tracking metrics and actual purchase behaviour is often surprisingly weak. By tracking Share of Search, we have a powerful metric to measure what people are actually doing online, rather than what they say they are doing."

— Les Binet, Head of Effectiveness at adam&eveDDB

ShareOfSearchOps turns this behavior into a structured, comparable metric — across brands, markets and time.

Share of Search emerged as a key theme at the ESOMAR conference — validating it as a core metric for modern brand tracking.

Three situations where Share of Search drives decisions

Sponsorship ROI

A brand invests in a major sponsorship. Within weeks, its Share of Search increases — while competitors remain flat.

This indicates real demand growth, not just visibility.

Competitive Shift

Two brands compete in the same category. One gains +8% in Share of Search, while the other declines.

This signals a shift in market demand before it shows up in sales.

Market Entry

Search demand rises in a specific region. Share of Search shows which brands gain traction first.

This helps identify where to enter early.

Search Behavior Beats Survey Answers

Side by side, Share of Search tracking outperforms traditional brand surveys on every dimension that matters.

rascasse.com/shareofsearch — comparison
Category Survey-based Brand Tracking Share of Search Tracking Outcome
Predictive Power Limited — often lagging behind Strong — leading indicator for sales & market share Better forecasting
Cost High Up to 60% lower Maximize ROI
Timeliness Quarterly / Annual Monthly / Weekly / Daily Agile decision-making
Granularity Usually Country-level Up to City-level (Artist/Genre) Localized planning
Flexibility Changes break timeseries Dynamic, can restate 4 years of data Scalable tracking

From search behavior to strategic decisions.

1

Start with search behavior

Understand what people actively look for across brands, topics and categories.

2

Identify demand shifts

See where interest is growing, declining or moving across markets.

3

Act ahead of the market

Make decisions before demand shows up in sales or reports.

Real demand. Real decisions.

Insight

Tesla is reshaping the premium automotive landscape in Germany

Driver

+8.2pp Share of Search growth over 48 months, concentrated in urban markets. BMW, Mercedes and Audi all losing ground.

Implication

Incumbent brands need to respond now — this is a structural shift, not a temporary spike.

Recommended Action

Where to defend, where to invest

Munich
BMW stable at 31%
▲ Defend
Berlin
Tesla overtaking Audi
▬ At risk
Hamburg
Mercedes -4pp YoY
★ Opportunity
Recommended Action

Increase media spend in Berlin and Hamburg where competitor share is weakening. Protect Munich with loyalty campaigns.

Strategic Output

Fashion Returns — Quality Perception Risk

Q1 2025
Confidential
1
Shein — Returns searches +12pp
▲ Alert 2
Zalando — Stable at 34.2%
Leader 3
H&M — Returns declining -2pp
▼ Improving
Key Insights
  • • Shein’s returns share is growing faster than its sales share — quality perception risk
  • • Zalando’s dominance in returns searches reflects category leadership, not a problem
  • • H&M’s improving returns signal suggests operational changes are working
Recommended Action

Monitor Shein returns trend as early quality signal. Use declining returns share as a competitive differentiator in marketing.

Final Recommendation

Increase investment in high-growth segments within the next quarter to capture early demand.

Market intelligence that drives decisions.

Understand what people actually search for — and where demand is moving next.

Predicts the Future

Share of Search is a leading indicator — it shows market share shifts months before they appear in sales data. Act early, not late.

Real Behavior, Not Opinions

People search for what they actually want. No survey bias, no recall errors, no social desirability. Pure intent data.

4 Years of History

Restate historical data anytime. Add brands, change categories, compare — without losing the timeline. Full flexibility, full continuity.

What you can answer with ShareOfSearchOps.

Brand Health Monitoring

"Is our brand gaining or losing mindshare?"

Track your Share of Search vs. competitors over time with daily precision. Spot momentum shifts before they become trends.

Quality Perception

"Are people searching for our returns more than competitors?"

Attribute-level search analysis reveals perception issues before they hit NPS. Track searches for returns, complaints, reviews, or alternatives.

Market Entry Timing

"When is the right moment to enter a new market?"

Monitor category search growth by city to identify readiness. See where demand is building before committing resources.

Campaign Effectiveness

"Did our campaign actually move the needle?"

See the immediate impact on search share — days after launch, not months. Measure what campaigns do to real consumer interest.

Case Study

How a Fashion Brand Detected a Quality Crisis 3 Months Early

A European fashion retailer noticed their Share of Search for "returns" growing 2x faster than their overall brand search. This early warning signal led them to investigate their Q4 collection quality — discovering a supplier issue before it impacted customer satisfaction scores. They corrected course before peak season, avoiding an estimated EUR 8M in returns and preserving their NPS score.

3 Months
Early Warning
EUR 8M
Returns Avoided
NPS
Score Preserved